Social Media Musings: Political Satire

SocialMedia3

Scott Cairns, NYU ’15

Where I come from, the average under-20-year old on the street finds politics to be a daunting and dreary subject. The highest level of interest comes around election time, when politics becomes synonymous with a boxing match between two candidates and debates produce quotes that dominate the watercooler talk for the next week. However, without knowing it, these same under-20-year-olds follow the political conversation in America all year round when they turn on ‘Comedy Central.’

Political satire is an art form that has been perfected in America. The same person who professes to be bored by politics will bend over backwards in laughter over the stylings of Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert, wildly popular satirists with their own shows that air nightly. These men, with thousands of followers and fans, are not without their own political opinions. In fact, they are more than happy to spill their opinions each night on the air, with a comedic spin of course.

These are the ‘power users,’ figures with the ability to influence large groups of people with their Twitter accounts and blogs, that professors Cristian Vaccari and Augosto Valeriani allude to in their upcoming paper: ‘Follow the leader! Dynamics and Patterns of Activity among the Followers of the Main Italian Political Leaders during the 2013 General Election Campaign.’ As expected, the professors find that ‘most of them are celebrities in realms other than politics or people who are already highly visible in the politics-media ecosystem.’ My question for the authors when they come together at the upcoming LPD conference on Social Media and Political Participation is this: how does this quasi-interest in politics that is channeled through political satire translated into actual interest? Do people ever find themselves wanting to learn more, or are they just tuning in to crack a joke in the direction of a Silvio Berlusconi-esque politician?

To learn more about our upcoming conference on Social Media and Political Participation, click here.

To join the conference conversation on social media, click here.

To learn more about the latest research at NYU in the field of social media and political participation, click here visit the online lab of NYU Professor and conference organizer Joshua Tucker.

Social Networks, Peer Pressure, and Protest Participation

SocialMedia3By Morgan Hubbard, NYU ’15

Participant Alexey Makarin from the New Economic School in Moscow will be presenting a paper on Social Networks, Peer Pressure and Protest Participation at the upcoming LPD Social Media and Political Participation Conference.   With an estimated 1.1 billion users on Facebook alone, it is clear that the role of social media has increased dramatically within the last decade.  Social media outlets such as Facebook and others, allow one to be connected with people and news throughout the world twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week.  Thus, social media, as well as social motivation (such as peer pressure via social networks), could possibly be used as a vital tool in protests.  Makarin’s paper specifically investigates, “whether social incentives are similarly important for taking part in political protests.”  Harnessing the power of social media and using social motivation to give protesters an incentive to participate could have an effect on many of the current protest movements in the news today.  So, if you are even the least bit interested in social media come to this conference and learn more about Makarin’s paper as well as many others.  Also, “socially motivate” your friends to come!

NYU Students: Thirty Minutes of Fame

by Amanda Esteves, Adriana Basti, Lola Harney, Tabatha Johnston, Thomas Marra, Peter Mezey, Nasim Mirzai, Stephanie Silva, Katharine Thornton, Nathan Verrilli, Tara Wilson

Friday, April 12, for NYU’s “l’Okkupazione,” Massimo Reale’s Italian classes went to Figline Valdarno where they visited  RTV38 www.rtv38.com one of the three most important Italian local TV stations.  RTV is well known for their up to date technology.  Even the two largest national networks (RAI and Mediaset) are experimenting with the new cameras and systems employed by RTV.  We met with the director of the station, Francesco Selvi, who brought us inside the studio.  Then Fabrizio, the “tech-wiz” explained to us the tricks of the trade

In the studio there was only a greenscreen, no people.  Not even a cameraman, only computers, cameras, lamps, and lights—everything automated and commanded by the director of the station. The computer graphics do the rest. There could be an interview in front of the green screen and people watching it would think this person to be in Roma, in Africa or at the Niagara Falls! Every year Fabrizio goes to the technology fairs in Las Vegas and Amsterdam to update himself and buy the newest machines.

The technology comes from every part of the world – America, Italy, Japan, Israel, etc. Certain equipment, he told us, go along with the evolution of the military telecommunications systems. As we were listening to Fabrizio, the 12:30pm news started. Francesco said: “The TG is starting, would you like to go on air?”

Amanda and Nathan got up in a second and the technicians prepared them in a minute. The rest you can see in the clip: they were to the left and right of journalist Luca Renzoni, answering his questions eloquently. They were streaming live; the whole world could see them!

Afterwards we met Boris Mugnai, the head boss of the RTV38, took a quick look at the other technological gadgets of the studio and thanked everyone for their hospitality.

However, the hunger was growing among the students. Fortunately, thirty meters from the TV station there was a nice pastry shop, spacious and comfortable. We ate many special treats from Neapolitan and Sicilian tradition: cannoli, sfogliatelle and babà al rum.

Social Media Musings: It All Comes Out on the Internet

SocialMedia3

By Scott Cairns, NYU ’15

In an age where every politician is expected to have a Facebook, Twitter, or Blog, we now have a unique window into the minds of our local, state, and even national politicians. What these social media channels translate into is often a two-way conversation between politicians and their constituencies, where every thought that these public representatives post is dissected, interpreted, and commented on. The honesty that this new ‘dialogue’ calls for is much less conducive to happy political parties, where two politicians in one party with two very different ideologies may in the past have played nice in person but now express their true feelings via blog.

Upon voicing these honest opinions online, politicians may find a network of their constituents  who agree with them, convincing them to stand by their opinions (because who doesn’t love positive reinforcement). Look at the Italian Democratic Party, whose recent faction-ization was fueled by the clear public disappointment expressed through nearly every media channel–traditional or new–in former leader Pier Luigi Bersani, contrasted with the popularity of Matteo Renzi.

Andrea Ceron and Alessandra Caterina Cremonesi of the University of Milan will investigate this very phenomenon at LPD’s upcoming conference on Social Media and Political Participation. As their abstract for the forthcoming paper, “Politicians Go Social, Estimating Intra-party Heterogeneity (and its Effects) through the Analysis of the Social Media,” they state that ‘politicians belonging to different party factions feel free to express their sincere preferences on social media (blogs) of social network sites like Facebook and Twitter.” We’ll have to see what all of this newfound brutal honesty does to party dynamics and the voice of voters on the day-to-day functioning of their member-parties.

To learn more about our upcoming conference on Social Media and Political Participation, click here.

To join the conference conversation on social media, click here.

To learn more about the latest research at NYU in the field of social media and political participation, click here visit the online lab of NYU Professor and conference organizer Joshua Tucker.

Daily Italian Politics Briefing, Tuesday, April 30

Thumbnail Italian ElectionsNow that we have a new cabinet there is a widespread feeling that we have won a battle, but there’s still a war to be fought.

Enrico Letta’s bipartisan cabinet won the vote of confidence in the Chamber of Deputies last night, and most likely it will also get the vote of confidence in the Senate, where voting will take place today.

Asking for the vote of confidence in parliament, Prime Minister Letta outlined the political agenda of his cabinet: there are many economic and institutional reforms that can no longer be postponed.

In addition to that, The Democratic Party following the unfavorable situation during the presidential election, and the Five Star Movement following the publication of the contents of the mailbox of Giulia Sarti, a M5S deputy, are struggling to stabilize their internal situations. The PD has started identifying the next party leader after Pierluigi Bersani’s resignation, while M5S is trying to overshadow the internal struggles and to focus is attention to citizens’ real needs.

Social Media Musings: Occupy Wall Street

SocialMedia3

By Scott Cairns, NYU ’15

Remember when Occupy Wall Street was touted as the start of a new era in American politics? Then, remember when it all fell apart? When Alessandro Flammini of the University of Indiana presents his findings on “The Rise and Decline of the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ Movement from a Digital Perspective,” I wonder if he will come to the same conclusion I did: a movement, whether digital or tangible, is nothing without a leader.

A digital movement with a leader can go places. Here in Italy, we have a prime example in Mr. Beppe Grillo of the Five Star Movement. He was the face of a blog that basically ran his campaign for him, but the important thing is that he was indeed a FACE: a tangible human being who people could envision speaking to them when reading the blog. That human being could be found at rallies, always speaking the same message in the same fiery passionate style.

This is what OWS lacked. In Flammini’s abstract for his upcoming presentation at our conference, he finds that ‘online activity was strongly correlated with ‘on the ground events’ but then that these events ‘focused on organizational aspects rather than collective framing.’ Collective framing is a problem that is addressed when you’re movement is framed around a leader who represents the movement. If you ask me, part of why Beppe was so successful is that he had a chance to watch OWS unfold and learn from past mistakes.

To learn more about our upcoming conference on Social Media and Political Participation, click here.

To join the conference conversation on social media, click here.

To learn more about the latest research at NYU in the field of social media and political participation, click here visit the online lab of NYU Professor and conference organizer Joshua Tucker.

 

 

 

Daily Italian Politics Briefing, Monday, April 29

Thumbnail Italian ElectionsMany things happened over this long weekend. While Italy celebrated its 68th Anniversary of the Liberation form the Nazis, Enrico Letta, appointed by President Napolitano to form a new cabinet, consulted with all political forces in parliament to form a government representing a large parliamentary majority.

It looks like Letta finally succeeded in his task: a new cabinet, composed by ten Democratic Party members, five People of Freedom Party members, three members form Mario Monti’s coalition, one from the Radical Party (Emma Bonino), and four “technicians”, that is, professionals not coming from politics, among whom there is Anna Maria Cancellieri, former Minister of Interior in Monti’s cabinet and current Minister of Justice (check out THe Wall Street Journal’s article on Enrico Letta’s cabinet).

While the new cabinet was attending the swearing-in ceremony a man opened fire in front of Palazzo Chigi, the building where Italian cabinets traditionally hold their meetings and where the new cabinet was expected to come right after the ceremony. Two military police officers and a passer-by were wounded in the shooting. The shooter, immediately arrested, is Luigi Preiti, an unemployed man from Calabria region. Under interrogation, he declared that his original intention was to strike politicians.

All political forces condemned the act of violence, while a great part of Italian political debate focused on how the rift between politics and citizens has deepened and on how the fragility of Italian current political and economic situation increased the sense of frustration and despair among the population.

Today Enrico Letta’s cabinet will be submitted to a vote of confidence in parliament: it will probably have the support of the PD, the PDL and Monti’s coalition, while Five Star Movement and Nichi Vendola’s party (Left Ecology Freedon, SEL) will oppose it.

We’ll see if this new cabinet will succeed in pursuing its political agenda, that has among his first task the revision of the tax on real estate (Imposta Municipale Unica) and some political and institutional reforms.

Daily Italian Politics Briefing, Wednesday, April 24

Thumbnail Italian ElectionsTo whom will Napolitiano give the task of government today? We still don’t know, but the choice is between Giuliano Amato and Enrico Letta.

In addition to Napolitano’s announcement, newspapers are outlining the possible future members of the cabinet: some may be former ministers of Monti’s cabinet, some may be outstanding politicians, but many others may not have a political background, coming from the institutional, academic or professional world.

Yesterday a meeting of Democratic Party leadership (Direzione Nazionale) took place in Rome. Bersani confirmed his resignation and the party approved a document that officially states the PD’s support for president Napolitano’s efforts to form a cabinet.

In other important news, for the first time, although not openly stated, there was a general consensus for Matteo Renzi as a possible PD candidate to lead the government. though Napolitano found more support for Enrico Letta and Giuliano Amato, Mayor Renzi, as Corriere della Sera reports, was very satisfied with the course of the meeting, because this traces the path for a better relationship with the other party members and possibly to a future leadership.

Daily Italian Politics Briefing, Tuesday, April 23

Thumbnail Italian ElectionsGiorgio Napolitano yesterday delivered his acceptance speech after the traditional pledge that the president of the republic takes when he’s elected.

Napolitano’s speech was very straightforward and at times even moving. He stated that despite his numerous appeals politicians behaved irresponsibly in the last years, and that the disastrous performance of the previous joint session voting before his election was the direct outcome of this irresponsibility. An article in Corriere della Sera interestingly notes that all politicians in attendance (except Five Star Movement deputies and senators) cheered as if the president was blaming someone else, and not them, for the situation.

He said that he accepted only due to his respect and devotion to the Italian republic.

Napolitano accepted to have a second term only on condition that political forces will be able to form a new cabinet as soon as possible.

Today Napolitano will have consultations with all political parties in Parliament in order to form a new cabinet as soon as possible. La Stampa reports on Napolitano’s schedule for today: he will first meet this morning with both the President of the Chamber of Deputies, Laura Boldrini, and with the President of the Senate, Pietro Grasso. The meeting between the president and the Democratic Party’s delegation will end this day of consultations.

Meanwhile, La Stampa reports also that Mayor Renzi expressed in a note to the president his willingness to become the head of the cabinet in case it’s needed.

La Repubblica reports that Beppe Grillo expressed his opposition to Napolitano’s election, saying that this will prevent the dissolution of the Italian traditional political structure, protecting Berlusconi and other politicians that are guilty of the problems that the country is now facing.

Napolitano emphasized the need for bi-partisan cooperation especially during this time of economic difficulty in Italy.

He called for political leaders to work together, to form a government for the good of the country and reminded political leaders that their primary responsibility is to the people, not the political parties.

Daily Italian Politics Briefing, Monday, April 22

Thumbnail Italian ElectionsAs we expected on Friday, we now have a new president of the Italian republic.

Giorgio Napolitano, the former president, accepted to guide the country for a second term (though he imposed conditions for his acceptance on Bersani, Berlusconi and Monti some). For the first time since the foundation of the Italian republic will have a second.

The problem of finding a new president is now solved. Nevertheless, politicians and the Italian people feel like the current problems are far from being solved, and instead are getting complicated. Why? This question has many answers.

1) The Democratic Party is getting very close to dissolution. Many of its outstanding members have been politically destroyed: first of all, Pierluigi Bersani, the party leader, resigned last Friday (check out Reuter’s article on Bersani’s resignations). Bersani resigned because he didn’t manage to consolidate the support of his party. Franco Marini and Romano Prodi, who he had proposed as potential candidates for the presidency, didn’t gather the support of a large portion of the party. But now Bersani’s fiercest opponents fear the consequences of his resignation: the party’s dissolution.

2)Beppe Grillo comes out as the political winner of this situation. Again, his accusations against the traditional political class turned out (at least on the surface) to be plausible, because effectively these elections appeared to be dominated by the interests of politicians and not by people’s needs. As in the general elections, other political forces committed a mistake with the Five Stat Movement by completely bypassing their candidate for the presidency, Stefano Rodotà. Traditional political forces excluded M5S from the decision-making process, allowing them to continue to play on the level of political propaganda, where they are stronger than anyone else.

3) One of Napolitiano’s conditions to agree to a second term was the formation of a new cabinet supported by a large majority of the parliament. Bersani, Berlusconi and Monti were “forced” to accept this condition in order to end the stalemate and have a new president of the republic, but this obviously will further alienate voters from their parties.

As we observed at the beginning of this post, one issue as been resolved but many other issues have been raised during the weekend.