‘Firenze tra identità e cambiamento’: An Interview with Giuliano Da Empoli

By NYU Florence students Tyler Barbacovi, James Clarizio, Amanda Esteves, Lola Harney, Tabatha Johnston, Ji Kim and Alessandra Tortorello

Con la nostra classe di Italiano, Advanced Review of Modern Italian, nell’ambito del  progetto “Firenze tra identità e cambiamento”,  in cui abbiamo lavorato per capire più a fondo questa città così particolare nella sua storia, ma anche nel suo presente, abbiamo avuto il piacere di conoscere una figura importante nella polìtica fiorentina e italiana, Giuliano da Empoli.

Lo scorso 9 novembre siamo andati a Palazzo Strozzi per incontrarlo e fargli un’intervista. Eravamo tutti un po’ timidi,  ma il nostro incontro si è trasformato in una piacevole “chiacchierata” informale perché lui è sembrato subito molto simpatico e divertente.

In questa  nostra intervista ìntima con lui al Palazzo Strozzi abbiamo scoperto più di questo uomo significo.

Nato in Francia, da Empoli ha visitato tanti diversi paesi nel mondo e parla molte lingue. Ora abita in Toscana e ama Firenze, ma possiamo dire che  lui parla come un cittadino del mondo e, come Renzi,  è pensato di essere troppo giovane per il suo lavoro.

Da Empoli è il presidente del Gabinetto Viessieux, una istituzione molto importante nel panorama culturale della città ed è molto vicino al Sindaco Matteo Renzi.  E’ stato Assessore alla Cultura del Comune di Firenze fino a poco tempo fa e, pur non essendo fiorentino di nascita,  sembra conoscere molto bene  questa città così particolare.

Secondo lui, Firenze è una città dinamica anche se appare un po’ chiusa e conservatrice.

Il suo ruolo è rendere la città più moderna e viva. Per questo lui ha provato a portare degli artisti a Firenze e anche ha iniziato il progetto del “Think Tank, Big Bang”.
“Da Empoli incarna una nuova idea della politica giovane.”, dice Mara Simonti, professoressa della nostra classe avanzata.

Lui ha detto a noi molte cose della differenza tra la politica dell’America verso la politica confusa in Italia. Abbiamo parlato della campagna politica di Obama e anche di Renzi e da Empoli pensa che la politica locale sia più importante nell’Italia che negli Stati Uniti. Da Empoli è sembrato molto simpatico e divertente. Noi pensiamo che lui sia buono per la città a combinare l’antico e tradizionale con il moderno. È stato un vero privilegio per noi poter parlare con lui.

Student coverage of the US Politics: Election Experts Analyze the Results conference

New York University Florence students Ann Schmidt, Emmanuelle Libelule Wiley, Scott Mullen, Victoria Murray, Carmen Germaine and Amanda Esteves covered the US Politics: Elections Experts Analyze the Results conference on November 16-17. Read their report from inside the conference and profile pieces on the participants. For more information on the conference click here.

 

Calling all NYU Florence students!!

The election is over and we now it’s time to analyze the results! Next Friday-Saturday, November 16-17, some of the most important campaign insiders from the Romney and Obama camps, political analysts and media experts (the ones you see on TV!) from both sides of the Atlantic will come to campus to analyze the results of the elections and provide an insiders view point from behind the scenes. It is an extraordinary opportunity for you to meet with experts who have been truly inside the process. Students from the University of Florence and the University of Bologna will also attend.

Get involved in the following activities!Journalism Workshop
Aspiring student journalists are invited to ‘cover’ the event. They will meet with Marylouise Oates, former reporter for the Los Angeles Times, beforehand to get tips on how to cover an event, interview participants, and write an article. Students will be given front row seating at the conference and special access to participants to conduct interviews. Finally, Ms. Oates will read submitted work and will provide individual feedback. The best articles will be published on the La Pietra Dialogues website and will be submitted to English language newspapers in Florence for consideration for publication.Video Project
NYU Florence students are invited to join a team of University of Bologna political communications students who will be producing a video documentary of the event, including in-depth interviews with participants. An NYU Florence student will be paired with a University of Bologna student to prepare for and conduct the interviews.

LPD Organizational Team
Become part of La Pietra Dialogues’ organizational team. Help us organize the event, work with participants and be part of the conference team at Villa Sassetti during the event!

For more information visit the LPD websitewww.lapietradialogues.org or write to us at lapietra.dialogues@nyu.edu

Join our organizational meeting on Monday November 12 at 12 noon in the Blue Room of Villa Natalia or at 4pm in the LPD offices in Villa Sassetti.

Badara Seck meets with NYU Florence Music Students

Badara Seck, renowned Senegalese singer and musician, met with NYU Florence music students on March 20 to talk about the griot tradition in music, the fusion of different musical traditions and the importance of music in fostering dialogue in today’s multicultural societies.  Through anecdotes from his childhood, Badara explained how music is integrated into the daily life of the village where he grew up, and plays a central part in preserving the village’s long history.  The integration of improvisation, and informal “making music together”, as explained by Mr. Seck, provided a refreshing relief to the students heavily academic program.  The encounter closed with an improvised performance by Badara Seck and NYU Music Program coordinator Greg Burk.

Breakfast with Imma Vitelli

On February 10, a group of NYU Florence students had the pleasure of meeting Imma Vitelli, International Correspondent for Vanity Fair Italy, for breakfast following her Dialogue in The Arab Spring Series. Students asked questions about her experience as a war correspondent – “Are you ever afraid?”. Her reply: “If you are afraid, you don’t go into this line of work” – and what she thinks the future holds for Middle Eastern countries undergoing transition – Her simple answer: “I don’t know.” The very frank and lively conversation provided students insight into what is going on on the ground and challenged some of their assumptions. Other issues discussed: the role the media plays in shaping public perceptions and the challenges journalists face when reporting from a conflict zone. The stories of the people she met along the way gave the uprisings a human face and provided a deeper insight into the experience, motivations, challenges and successes of the protesters.

My Work on the LPD Archive Project

By Sunny Chen, NYU Student

An event is ephemeral. People come together then part. How can we know what happened if we weren’t there? All that is left is a compilation of images and words.

I joined LPD in the Spring of 2011 and started out as a volunteer for the archive project. The goal was to organize all of the paper related to one conference into a bound copy. The first stage of the work began with my exploration. I found a wealth of information– the programs handed out at the event, the invitation card that was sent, the budget spread sheet, the press coverage, the correspondence with a certain speaker and guest…etc.. I was amazed because I had no prior conference planning experience; I learned about the scope of the work of conference planning by sifting through these papers. Still, I didn’t have a clear idea of how a conference could be presented in a book. Should the archive content be organized chronologically? Should we first trace the initial research of the topic, follow the development of the idea and the eventual twists and turns over which particular speaker to invite – putting the emphasis on the planning process? Or, would it be more helpful to start with the broader view of what the conference had become, beginning with the final programs that were handed out at the actual event? The decision of how to structure an archive is inseparable from who the target audience will be.

Through discussions with Megan, the LPD Coordinator, we decided that we would orient the archive for the newcomer to LPD. We assumed the most accessible way of organizing the information would be to start off with the broad picture of the conference: the Doc Pack, which contains the material distributed at the actual conference including the program and the biographies of speakers. The Doc Pack would be followed by information surrounding the main event, such as advising flyers, posters, invitations, and an announcement of the next conference, as well as the last La Pietra Dialogues Newsletter. The second section would be Media. The third section would contain details of the budget and logistics, followed by correspondence, research, and personal notes and remarks from the conference organizers and the Director. Defining and organizing all the categories was a lot of fun! It also helped me understand what happens before, after, and during the main conference.

An archive is a map to the past; there are various ways of constructing the trip one will take with this particular map. The old map is still valuable because it serves as a reference for our future journey. Each conference planning is a process of exploration. As it is a process, it can become better practiced through repetition. Maybe we haven’t personally gone through the planning process before and we face an entirely new terrain. The archive still provides a continuation from past experiences, allowing us to build from what we already have.

The Importance of Social Media to Furthering and Enriching Dialogue in its Multiplicity

By Gabriela Mendieta, NYU Student

Our world once challenged by distance and language barriers has developed tools to further our interactions with peers all around the world. Online social media grants a voice that can transcend across nations. Even the challenges of foreign languages are overcome with the ability to translate a page with the click of a button.

Blogs, twitter, and Facebook are some of the platforms for communicating a message. Once shared online your message is capable of reaching an infinite number of people anywhere in the world. Although the range of reach is a significant component of social media, the power lies in the interactivity. After a message reaches its audience, the audience has the power to communicate back. The communication may be conducted in the form of “liking” something on Facebook, sharing a picture on twitter, posting a video on a blog or a number of other expressive interactions. This is the dialogue of today.

Dialogue in our age of mass technology and globalization is more than an exchange of words. Today dialogue no longer requires face to face contact or even knowing the other individual. Dialogue can include two people or two thousand people. In some instances the topic may be discussed and concluded quickly; other times a dialogue may invite contribution over an extended period of time. This open-ended dialogue is continually nourished with opinions due to the internet’s ability to house an active or dormant discussion for an infinite amount of time.

The flexibility of online social media allows for dialogues of all kinds to take place at any hour, from any location. Social media is expanding the definition and concept of what a dialogue is. Embracing social media is essential for anyone developing and hoping to enhance a dialogue in today’s society.

Pete Hamill and the Importance of Reading and Writing

By Kate Lardner, NYU Florence Student

Reading and writing is something that almost every person in North America does on a daily basis, yet it’s rarely something that is discussed on any kind of level with the exception of politicians “outraged” by the illiteracy rates in their country. But in a Dialogue Monday night, Pete Hamill talked about where these two subjects come from and how they affect our lives. Everyone has that one book that gets them hooked on reading, for Hamill it was Babar. Even though at first he couldn’t read the words, he understood the pictures of Babar’s mother being killed and Babar visiting Paris, and because of that Hamill “… still hate[s] guns and [he] still love[s] Paris.” Hamill also compared fiction and journalism and talked about how you can find inspiration in anything around you if you only open your eyes and your imagination. Growing up in Brooklyn, Hamill had firsthand experience of being raised in a working class family. However, he made a point of saying that just because you are poor doesn’t mean that you are impoverished and that your life couldn’t be rich. Even though the title of the Dialogue was Fiction and Journalism, it was really about the importance of reading and how it can change your life.

Inside the US Politics: Towards 2012 Conference

By Taylor McGuire, NYU Florence student

How many students can tell you that they shook hands with Bob Shrum and Paul Begala before sitting down to a small friendly breakfast to discuss politics? About fifteen students total, including myself, would supply the answer “Yes.” When I was helping research the biographies of a few political figures, I had no idea I would get to meet and talk to them.  The discussion over breakfast was intriguing and informational about the upcoming election. Unfortunately I had to leave for class, but the next day I attended half of the conference that took place throughout the day. Multiple people in the audience engaged in the dialogue and a few times the panels ran over their scheduled time. There was so much to talk about! I got to meet: Marylouise Oates, Steve McMahon, Bruce Haynes, and Steve Schmidt. Marylouise Oates is officially my new role model! There was a dinner held after the conference that a few students and I had the honor to attend. I snuck in early and stole the seat next to “Oatesy” as she asked me to call her. Throughout the entire dinner, we discussed politics, women’s’ rights, her career as an activist, the classes she teaches, how her and “Shrummy” (as she calls her husband) met, what I can do to handle my college work load, and she gave me a great idea for the La Pietra Dialogues project that I am working on. The girl that was sitting next to me and I also got a chance to chat with Steve Schmidt, who was on the other side of Oatesy, about how to get involved in politics. What really warmed my heart was towards the end of the dinner when Bob Shrum, Paul Begala, Oatesy, and Bruce Haynes all said that it was a pleasure getting to talk with the students since that was the biggest reason why they were present. The food was great and the wine was quite divine. The night ended at a decent time and I almost wish it wouldn’t have.